<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://eiffelroom.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>eiffelroom - Graph Library: Name Ideas - Comments</title>
 <link>http://eiffelroom.com/blog/maverick/graph_library_name_ideas</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Graph Library: Name Ideas&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I just thought of another</title>
 <link>http://eiffelroom.com/blog/maverick/graph_library_name_ideas#comment-273</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Ben for those interresting comments and suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just thought of another cool idea!  EAGLE:  Eiffel Algorithmic Graph Library Experiment.  I&#039;m not sure of the experiment part but the rest fits in nicely.  And since it was part of my first post, why not?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Send me your feedback please :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:05:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>maverick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 273 at http://eiffelroom.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>project name</title>
 <link>http://eiffelroom.com/blog/maverick/graph_library_name_ideas#comment-271</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems important to the personality of a project to get it a good name. It raises interest, makes it half real before it has even started. I don&#039;t pretend following are good names. I just give them as suggestions to give you ideas. Probably you&#039;ll find best to take parts of one and add it to one of yours.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Eiffel Formal Graphs&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Math2Eiffel&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Eiffel Graph Theory Port&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Eiffel Graph Intelligence&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Graphormalgorithms ! (Graph Formal Algorithms)&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Eiffel Applied Graphs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hope it helps !&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:44:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Vcimdarf</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 271 at http://eiffelroom.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I agree, AlGraph may be</title>
 <link>http://eiffelroom.com/blog/maverick/graph_library_name_ideas#comment-269</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, AlGraph may be misread.  I&#039;d be left with: &lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; glib;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Eiffel AlgoGraph;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Eiffel Algorithmic Graph&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The latter seems more formal and maybe this is something good if the library is to become more fundamental.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:12:27 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>maverick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 269 at http://eiffelroom.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What about ...</title>
 <link>http://eiffelroom.com/blog/maverick/graph_library_name_ideas#comment-268</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;glib? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A reason to use Eiffel AlgoGraph over Eiffel AlGraph is that for some fonts it&#039;s hard to distinguish it from AIGraph.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-- mTn-_-|&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 09:22:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mtn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 268 at http://eiffelroom.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Graph Library: Name Ideas</title>
 <link>http://eiffelroom.com/blog/maverick/graph_library_name_ideas</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Looking for a name, I told myself that looking for differences and originalities could help find qualifiers for the library name since GraphLibrary seems a little naked. I thought that marking especially differences from the EiffelGraph library would help distinguish them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know much about the former and I haven&#039;t found any documentation on the main Eiffel related development sites. The description provided on EiffelRoom leads me to think that it&#039;s much more a UI related library so there is no overlap between the two and they might even complement one another very well. In this line of idea, I note that a binding between the two would be interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So here are the adjectives I thought of to distinguish from EiffelGraph in particular and qualify the library:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Algorithmic, rather than graphic or UI oriented;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Model driven (we could also say `formal&#039;), which doesn&#039;t seem to be very wide spread;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt; Finally, it&#039;s made in Eiffel (obviously!).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Something like Eiffel Algorithmic and Model Driven Graph Library seems a little overkill even if we only call it EAMDGL. We could strip the library part and maybe the model driven part since it doesn&#039;t really cover the features of the library. We would be left with Eiffel Algorithmic Graph or EAG (which somewhat resembles the cry of someone tripping on a root) but it&#039;s not that bad either. We could also make some kind of mix like Eiffel AlGraph or Eiffel AlgoGraph.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think I&#039;ll settle for Eiffel AlGraph.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <comments>http://eiffelroom.com/blog/maverick/graph_library_name_ideas#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eiffelroom.com/tag/algorithmic">algorithmic</category>
 <category domain="http://eiffelroom.com/tag/graphs">Graphs</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:22:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>maverick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">189 at http://eiffelroom.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
